Efficiency Approaches to Job Design

Efficiency Approaches to Job Design

Not surprisingly, efficiency has been the dominant model for job design. Scientific management, pioneered by Frederick Taylor in 1911, emerged as a dominant perspective that examined how work should be structured to maximize worker efficiency.

One of the primary contributions of scientific management was the standardization of production processes. This standardization included how employees performed their work, how employees’ workdays were structured, when and how often employees took breaks from their work, and how much responsibility employees were allowed on the job.

One common method for this type of analysis is time and motion studies – a systematic evaluation of the most basic elements of the tasks that comprise a job. Each job is broken down into its basic parts so that industrial engineers or managers can design jobs in a way that minimizes excessive movements or wasted time and that maximizes the time employees spend working on core job tasks.

Job specialization is the process of breaking down jobs into their simple core elements. By focusing on the core elements of a job, a company is able to limit the variety of tasks employees perform and increase the efficiency with which they perform them.

Another technique in the efficiency approach is job simplification which involves removing decision-making authority from the employee and placing it with a supervisor. Of course, a common result of job simplification, high repetition, and job specialization is that jobs are narrow in focus, without much, if any, discretion afforded employees. These jobs could be performed efficiently, but they often lack complexity and variety, which can lead to boredom, fatigue, and diminished job satisfaction.





Make Money Online on paidwork.com

Make Money Online on zoombucks.com

Make Money Online on squishycash.com



Not surprisingly, efficiency has been the dominant model for job design. Scientific management, pioneered by Frederick Taylor in 1911, emerged as a dominant perspective that examined how work should be structured to maximize worker efficiency.

One of the primary contributions of scientific management was the standardization of production processes. This standardization included how employees performed their work, how employees’ workdays were structured, when and how often employees took breaks from their work, and how much responsibility employees were allowed on the job.

One common method for this type of analysis is time and motion studies – a systematic evaluation of the most basic elements of the tasks that comprise a job. Each job is broken down into its basic parts so that industrial engineers or managers can design jobs in a way that minimizes excessive movements or wasted time and that maximizes the time employees spend working on core job tasks.

Job specialization is the process of breaking down jobs into their simple core elements. By focusing on the core elements of a job, a company is able to limit the variety of tasks employees perform and increase the efficiency with which they perform them.

Another technique in the efficiency approach is job simplification which involves removing decision-making authority from the employee and placing it with a supervisor. Of course, a common result of job simplification, high repetition, and job specialization is that jobs are narrow in focus, without much, if any, discretion afforded employees. These jobs could be performed efficiently, but they often lack complexity and variety, which can lead to boredom, fatigue, and diminished job satisfaction.



source

human resource management,human resource,human resources,hr,hrm,people management,management,manage,managers,manager,Efficiency Approaches to Job Design,Efficiency Approaches,Job Design,Frederick Taylor,taylor,time and motion studies,Job specialization,job simplification

🔥0